What do you mean? Are you taking your BBS down? Or just abandoning the echo?
Why is it so important to keep this redundant echo going?
So, again, this one is redundant.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Mike Powell <=-
And that Joseph guy isn't really spamming. He's just speaking his mind,
and he's keeping it political. We can't require him to reply to our messages. Bjorn talked to him and he at least responded to Bjorn. (I
think they might be cousins.)
Why is it so important to keep this redundant echo going?
I still don't know what "redundant" means. Should I try using that Googler thing?
The good thing about this echo is the "no swearing" feature. I think it's a good idea, because without a rule like that, people will get carried away and say thing a lot more ridiculous that anything I ever said.
And that Joseph guy isn't really spamming. He's just speaking his mind, and he's keeping it political. We can't require him to reply to our messages. Bjor
talked to him and he at least responded to Bjorn. (I think they might be cousins.)
They were the "grown-ups" who heard the child pointing out that the Emperor
had no clothes. Rest assured, one day they will find out the truth.
Except they do swear. I can ask them not to, or not to use aliases, but they persist because they know there is nothing that can be done.
I have stopped enforcing either rule and no one has seemed to notice.
They were the "grown-ups" who heard the child pointing out that the Emperor
had no clothes. Rest assured, one day they will find out the truth.
I would rather not see this particular "Emperor" without any clothes. Yuck! :D
Except they do swear. I can ask them not to, or not to use aliases, but they persist because they know there is nothing that can be done.
I guess there's no sense in trying to moderate it, but I hope that you'll still join us for political discussions. I learned a lot of stuff from you over the years.
I guess there's no sense in trying to moderate it, but I hope that you' still join us for political discussions. I learned a lot of stuff from over the years.
I will still be in the other echoes. Just not this one because it will
be delisted. :)
Aaron Thomas wrote to Mike Powell <=-
Yea nobody reads the rules. We're lucky if we can get people to quote messages, or even post anything at all. It might be cool to make a politics message forum on the internet. That way you really can
moderate, and we can get more perspectives.
I guess there's no sense in trying to moderate it, but I hope that you
still join us for political discussions. I learned a lot of stuff from
over the years.
I will still be in the other echoes. Just not this one because it will be delisted. :)
Yea but other sysops will still have it. Delisting an echo sounds has similarities to moderating one.
But what Mike seems to be really saying is "I can't subvert/pervert this echo, so I need to make it go away because people are exposing my
master's lies there."
It probably doesn't help Mike's ego when most of us simply ignore his messages.
Yea but other sysops will still have it. Delisting an echo sounds has similarities to moderating one.
Maybe, but it won't flow as well. Once it is delisted, it is removed
from the NA file. That means that new sysops won't see it listed to add it, and some "on the ball" sysops will see it not listed and remove it from their systems.
Best to move on to one that is still listed.
Mike Powell wrote to AARON THOMAS <=-
I will still be in the other echoes. Just not this one because it will be delisted. :)
Yea but other sysops will still have it. Delisting an echo sounds has similarities to moderating one.
Maybe, but it won't flow as well. Once it is delisted, it is removed
from the NA file. That means that new sysops won't see it listed to
add it, and some "on the ball" sysops will see it not listed and remove
it from their systems.
It also means that any properly confingured Synchronet hubs (and maybe others) will soon quit listing it as available to be added when a FIDO sysop issues an areafix command.
Best to move on to one that is still listed.
This was the busiest echo on Fidonet. The major leftists are just absent right now because the witch hunt hasn't resumed yet.
The reason this echo has evolved into the present cesspool is, of
course, that the MAGA Cult members took over, never being able to keep
up a civilised discussion, but always throwing name-calling and insults
at anyone who dared question that their Supreme Leader was the Stable Genius he claimed to be.
Maybe it's because all those "leftists", meaning the few remaining participants not being brainwashed by your Supreme Leader's and convicted felon's lies, gave up on trying to warn you about would happen if you ignore all the warning signs, that the entire rest of the world could
see clearly, but that you refuced to see.
Now it's time for y'all to enjoy your Cool Aid while the rest of the world watches as your once self-proclaimed World Empire is going down
the same way all other empires throughout human history have gone. Including Sweden in the 17th century, I might add.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
But he still can do whatever he used to always do, but the poor guy is like a traffic cop on a busy street where nobody cares about the
whistle or the hand signals.
I blame the left.
Quoting Ron L. to Aaron Thomas <=-
Aaron Thomas wrote to Mike Powell <=-
Yea nobody reads the rules. We're lucky if we can get people to quote messages, or even post anything at all. It might be cool to make a politics message forum on the internet. That way you really can
moderate, and we can get more perspectives.
But what Mike seems to be really saying is "I can't subvert/pervert
this echo, so I need to make it go away because people are exposing my master's lies there."
It probably doesn't help Mike's ego when most of us simply ignore his messages.
Quoting Bj”rn Felten to Aaron Thomas <=-
Aaron Thomas -> Mike Powell skrev 2025-05-30 00:15:
This was the busiest echo on Fidonet. The major leftists are just absent right now because the witch hunt hasn't resumed yet.
Maybe it's because all those "leftists", meaning the few remaining participants not being brainwashed by your Supreme Leader's and
convicted felon's lies, gave up on trying to warn you about would
happen if you ignore all the warning signs, that the entire rest of
the world could see clearly, but that you refuced to see.
Now it's time for y'all to enjoy your Cool Aid while the rest of
the world watches as your once self-proclaimed World Empire is going
down the same way all other empires throughout human history have
gone. Including Sweden in the 17th century, I might add.
Strangely, when I tried to talk to Mike about something he was
spouting, he mentioned he was a moderator and if I didn't like what he
was spewing that I should go to some other forum.
Maybe, but it won't flow as well. Once it is delisted, it is removed from the NA file. That means that new sysops won't see it listed to add it, and some "on the ball" sysops will see it not listed and remove it from their systems.
This was the busiest echo on Fidonet. The major leftists are just absent right
now because the witch hunt hasn't resumed yet.
Best to move on to one that is still listed.
We used to have a BBS in my town called "Toys in the attic." It was a WC! boar
that was on autopilot for several years. We never did find out what happened t
the sysop, but I still logged on to it often just for fun.
I will still be in the other echoes. Just not this one because it wil
be delisted. :)
I keep hearing this. *WHEN* will it be "delisted"?
So you can't just leave the echo, and let somebody else be the
Moderator? Why is it "best" to move on?
Maybe, but it won't flow as well. Once it is delisted, it is removed from the NA file. That means that new sysops won't see it listed to
add it, and some "on the ball" sysops will see it not listed and remove it from their systems.
I hate to tell you this, but an echo doesn't need to be listed in the BACKBONE.NA file to be available to anybody. That document really
doesn't have much (any?) meaning any longer.
It also means that any properly confingured Synchronet hubs (and maybe others) will soon quit listing it as available to be added when a FIDO sysop issues an areafix command.
See above regarding NO REQUIREMENT to have anything to do with (any) .NA file.
Why keep an echo going that is redundant when there are at least *six* others dedicated to the same topic? Some of them are currently veryPOLITICS has 6301 message since last year
It's not an empire. We voted for Trump because we love him. He can onlyYou do realize that he just soiled himself... lol
be president for 4 more years and that's it. If we're lucky we'll get
him for 8 extra years as Vice President.
Mike Powell wrote to DAN CLOUGH <=-
Maybe, but it won't flow as well. Once it is delisted, it is removed from the NA file. That means that new sysops won't see it listed to add it, and some "on the ball" sysops will see it not listed and remove it from their systems.
I hate to tell you this, but an echo doesn't need to be listed in the BACKBONE.NA file to be available to anybody. That document really
doesn't have much (any?) meaning any longer.
It actually does. If you are running synchronet, which you are, and
are a hub, which I am, then synchronet uses the NA file to determine whether or not a node in "FIDO" should be allowed to areafix an echo
from the NA file set for "FIDO." If it is not in the NA file
designated for "FIDO," they cannot areafix that echo.
This keeps people from requesting echoes from other networks, or doing some stupid "refresh all" command and really breaking things. You
*can* configure your system so that it doesn't use an NA but, if you
are a hub, it is *not* wise. I know from experience it is a cluster-f
if you don't use them.
Granted, you can just manually add echoes to the NA each time you
refresh it, or maintain a separate NA file with the not-listed echoes,
but who wants to go to that trouble?
It also means that any properly confingured Synchronet hubs (and maybe others) will soon quit listing it as available to be added when a FIDO sysop issues an areafix command.
See above regarding NO REQUIREMENT to have anything to do with (any) .NA file.
See above. Your information is not correct for hubs, especially if you are on multiple networks.
Don Vally wrote to Dr. What <=-
Strangely, when I tried to talk to Mike about something he was
spouting, he mentioned he was a moderator and if I didn't like what he
was spewing that I should go to some other forum.
A fair and unbiased moderator if there ever was one!
Unfortunately, I had to block him as his messages were just ~ not
relevant. Doesn't mean I don't join the conversations, just filter out
the trash.
See above. Your information is not correct for hubs, especially if you are on multiple networks.
Mike, you really need to look at the Wiki, specifically the terms
"echolist", and the "Keys" specifier in sbbsecho.ini, applicable to each linked node. Basically, you specify a key which points to a filename,
which is essentially a .NA file for that FTN. Then that linked node can
only see/request echos for that FTN. It's very easy to set up, and
works perfectly. It *EXACTLY* solves the problem you're describing for
hubs on multiple networks.
be president for 4 more years and that's it. If we're lucky we'll get him for 8 extra years as Vice President.You do realize that he just soiled himself... lol
when you made that comment about those 8 extra years..
Dumas Walker wrote to DAN CLOUGH <=-
See above. Your information is not correct for hubs, especially if you are on multiple networks.
Mike, you really need to look at the Wiki, specifically the terms "echolist", and the "Keys" specifier in sbbsecho.ini, applicable to each linked node. Basically, you specify a key which points to a filename,
which is essentially a .NA file for that FTN. Then that linked node can only see/request echos for that FTN. It's very easy to set up, and
works perfectly. It *EXACTLY* solves the problem you're describing for
hubs on multiple networks.
We are saying the same thing, and it points to why the BACKBONE.NA *is* important. I am using the BACKBONE.NA for the "FIDO" keyed nodes, and suspect that others do, too. I would hope they are not attempting to
keep a FIDO NA file by hand.
Sysop: | altere |
---|---|
Location: | Houston, TX |
Users: | 69 |
Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
Uptime: | 11:51:04 |
Calls: | 1,172 |
Files: | 8,207 |
Messages: | 299,965 |