Any ideas? Is '1' not a valid QWK number? I have other areas in the
same ini file with single-digit numbers.
apam wrote to Blue White <=-
Area 1 is used for private email, I had meant to reserve it in the past for when I did implement email in qwk, but forgot to, so when I put private email i had to reserve it.
Any other one digit number should work just fine.
apam wrote to Blue White <=-
Area 1 is used for private email, I had meant to reserve it in the past for when I did implement email in qwk, but forgot to, so when I put private email i had to reserve it.
Any other one digit number should work just fine.
Thanks. I think that other BBS systems, like synchronet, use 0 for the private email QWK number so I did not think of that being an issue.
Glad I asked. :)
apam wrote to Blue White <=-
Area 1 is used for private email, I had meant to reserve it in the past for when I did implement email in qwk, but forgot to, so when I put private email i had to reserve it.
Any other one digit number should work just fine.
Thanks. I think that other BBS systems, like synchronet, use 0 for the private email QWK number so I did not think of that being an issue.
Glad I asked. :)
Oh? Hmm, maybe that's why I hadn't reserved 1 in the past. I thought
they used 1 perhaps I can change it to 0.
apam wrote to Blue White <=-
I've just pushed some fixes to use conference 0 instead of 1 for
email.. you should be able to use conference 1 again.
apam wrote to Blue White <=-
I've just pushed some fixes to use conference 0 instead of 1 for
email.. you should be able to use conference 1 again.
Sysop: | altere |
---|---|
Location: | Houston, TX |
Users: | 69 |
Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
Uptime: | 06:09:57 |
Calls: | 1,219 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 8,287 |
Messages: | 303,700 |